Identity is the quintessential aspect of being human! We express our identity by forming communities, which involves individuals who commune and form collectives. We express our identity through our language, behavior, and relationships. Our health is expressed through our performance and well-being. We have used the concept of “love” in business for sometime.
Robert Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love characterizes love by three aspects: Intimacy, Passion, and Commitment.
- Intimacy (or awareness) encompasses connectedness.
- Passion (or energy) encompasses drive or energy.
- Commitment encompasses short term decisions to be together and long term plans and accomplishments together.
One experiences love based on the strength of these three aspects. The theory identifies the following types of love:
- Non-love: The absence of all three aspects.
- Liking/friendship: This involves intimate liking, but not passion or commitment.
- Infatuated Love: This involves passion, but not intimacy or commitment.
- Empty Love: This involves commitment, but not passion or intimacy.
- Romantic Love: This involves intimacy and passion, but not commitment.
- Compassionate Love: This involves intimacy and commitment, but not passion.
- Fatuous Love: This involves passion and commitment, but not intimacy.
- Consummate Love: This involves intimacy, passion, and commitment; it is the complete form of love.
Furthermore, Robert Sternberg emphasizes the importance of translating the aspects of love into action. “Without expression,” he warns, “even the greatest of loves can die.”
Similarly, a more healthy community is one whose members are more connected, energetic, and committed while a less healthy community is one whose members are more disconnected, lifeless, and uncommitted. Furthermore, healthy communities must translate their love into action for it to thrive!
Fundamentally, the essence of a healthy community is love!
Inspired by a conversation with Tom Graves (@tetradian) of Tetradian…
In “Possessed by possession?”, Tom elegantly explores the theme & notion of possession and claims “our entire culture is possessed by possession.” Furthermore, Tom elegantly advocates “the alternative to a possession-based economy is a responsibility-based model: one in which we ‘own’ something because we declare responsibility for it and manage it accordingly.” The complete post is well worth a read!
However, rather than consider us being “possessed by possession,” perhaps we are experiencing the unfolding or emergence of our identities where the tensions between the individual and collective are being harmonized. This involves the evolution of our communities as we evolve and resolve these tensions, which include: identity, engagement, negotiation of meaning, participation through more tacit means, and reification through more explicit means. Perhaps the “possession-based economy” relates to our communities’ reification through more explicit means and perhaps the “responsibility-based economy” relates to our communities’ participation through more tacit means where we will ultimately resolve these tensions by optimally deriving the most meaning by engaging one another and discovering who & what we truly are. It is more than mere “alternative” between possession and responsibility but seeking holistic/integral resolution.
As Tom expresses:
But we’re architects: we’re used to constraints, in fact for most of us it’s the kind of challenge that we relish. Yet this is definitely ‘The Big One’: the greatest architectural challenge any of us will ever face. So what will this challenge mean to you – professionally, personally, in every other way? And what part will you play in this?
In our journey, we will explore, discover, and continuously evolve our identity — “we [must] declare responsibility [that is, self-responsibility] for it [that is, our identity] and manage it accordingly”!